Solicitor Angela Shaw

Today, Brian sent solicitor Angela Shaw of Grant Saw solicitors in London, the following email:

Dear Angela Shaw

Re: the human rights abuses of your former client, Brian Pead

Please note that at all times when we use the word ‘corrupt’ it is in accordance with the meaning placed on it by Baroness O’Loan in the Daniel Morgan Murder Inquiry Report.

We have every expectation that you will remember a case from 2008-2009 of Brian Pead, tried at Southwark Crown Court, despite the fact that there is no official record of that trial.

We expect that you’ll remember the case (i) because of Brian’s unusual surname and (ii) because of the case itself.

By way of a reminder, Brian Pead had two separate cases unlawfully Joindered against him

1) an allegation of exposing himself to three female students (all aged 21+)

2) an allegation of Attempted Incitement of a 14-year-old girl into sexual relations who did not even exist.

We understand from the GrantSaw website that you no longer practice Criminal Law but instead Civil Law (Wills & Trusts).

However, by way of a reminder, Brian was charged under Section of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 which clearly states that to be guilty of such an offence, there has to be a real person to have been Incited.

On 4th June 2008, when Brian was arrested for this alleged offence, police station advisor Marcia Weise (and your colleague at the former AA Mirsons) told him: “You have been clever enough to out-sting an illegal police operation and they will be out to get you.” Both you and Mr Bell were informed of this conversation.

You had instructed a barrister called Dominic Bell, whom you will recall Brian sacked during the bogus trial. (We refer to it as a ‘bogus’ trial because there is no record of it.) You will recall, we expect, that Mr Bell called you to Southwark Crown Court to inform you that he had been sacked by Brian and the judge was also informed. As an unrepresented Defendant, the case should have been stayed immediately but wasn’t.

Furthermore, at the point that the three students all stated in open court that they had never seen Brian’s genitals, the ‘trial’ ought to have been stopped because it is clear the jury (who had not been sworn in) was biased because they heard two allegations of a sexual nature involving “younger women” against Brian, an older man.

We wish to say straightaway that no blame is apportioned to you as far as our research has taken us.

If you recall, Mr Bell refused to call Defence witness Geoffrey Bacon, whose computer had been illegally seized by the Police and the hard drive burnt out – wiping off Brian’s innocence from it.

There is no doubt that Mr Bacon should have been called to Court and, after all, Mr Bell had his full contact details.

We believe that a “Guilty” verdict was unlawfully engineered against Brian (with Bell playing his part) because Brian, you will recall, had been unlawfully dismissed from Lambeth Council after reporting child abuse and trafficking (which was his job as a Head teacher to do so.)

A simple Google search will inform you that Lambeth was one of the 13 Local Authorities castigated at the Independent Investigation into Child Sexual Abuse a few years later, and Brian spoke to the then presiding judge, Lowell Goddard. https://www.iicsa.org.uk/search?sq=brian+pead

Brian appealed the bogus conviction and reported Mr Bell to the Queen, the Prime Minister, the home Secretary, the Director of public Prosecutions (Keir Starmer at that time) and Others and within two weeks was promptly arrested on a bogus charge of Harassing his own daughter and grandchildren by sending them details of his miscarriage of justice.

That was the prelude to Brian being persecuted for 20 years, which is still ongoing.

In January 2010, (a couple of weeks after the ‘Guilty’ verdict of Inciting a girl who did not exist), Brian attended the Chambers of Mr Bell (Charter Chambers) and you were present. Never having trusted Mr Bell, Brian took the sensible precaution of audio recording the meeting, copies of which exist in various safe locations.

He later uploaded this to his website (LambethChildAbuse.org – since removed by the authorities because it told the truth) and Mr Bell then telephoned Brian (14th April 2013) and tried to blackmail him by saying that if he didn’t remove the audio recording, he would tell people that Brian had offered money for sex with underage girls. Clearly Brian has never done that, but it is a strong indication of Mr Bell’s distorted and corrupt mindset. On the facts of the case alone, he ought to be in prison, but he won’t be because he is being protected by a Top Level Paedophile Network which Brian inadvertently came into contact with when he reported child grooming and trafficking at Lambeth.

Brian also sent you copious notes about the child abuse he and his brothers (and many others) had suffered in the Highfield Oval children’s home in Harpenden, Hertfordshire in the late 1950s and early 1960s. (See http://www.brianpead.com/About)

Brian also informed Mr Bell that he was studying for an Advanced Diploma in Humanistic Integrative Counselling (which he was awarded prior to the bogus trial) and that the core feature of the Advanced Diploma was on psychosexual matters.  Of course it follows that, having been badly abused in the children’s home, Brian would maintain a keen interest in such psychosexual matters.

At the meeting in Charter Chambers, you and Brian had a brief conversation about the ‘Guilty’ verdict and you said:

“Primarily in my mind it was disappointing that you were found guilty because of the repercussions … of it … is there’s just so many different things …it’s very disappointing. The repercussions include being on the Register, yep, I think that’s probably the worst, more than anything else. I don’t know how long that will be for        …your family… your grand-children … your daughter … your whole life … absolutely.”

(For the avoidance of doubt, Brian never did “sign the Register” because he knew he was innocent. Nor did he attend any “courses to address his offending” for the same reason.)

Brian is (and was) a doting grandfather who had a weekly presence in the lives of his grandchildren, and they had told his daughter that he was “their favourite grandparent” because of his active involvement in their emotional and intellectual development.

The Police unlawfully engineered the removal of Brian from their lives and in 2011, again following a series of letters of complaint to the Queen and Others, Brian was again arrested and imprisoned for the alleged “Witness Intimidation” of his then 12-year-old granddaughter, Emily Birch, for saying “Hello” to her a bus stop. Emily has never been a witness in any trial or hearing.

We draw your attention to the recently-launched website www.brianpead.com in which you are featured as being the Instructing Solicitor. At no point are you blamed or defamed in any way. The website merely publishes provable facts.

Brian has written a number of books about his 20 years of persecution and these can be found on the website.

Brian has been sent to prison on five separate occasions – all as an innocent man. On one occasion he was found “Guilty” of Impersonating a Barrister when he had acted as a McKenzie Friend in a civil court case involving an associate.

On one occasion Brian was sent to 10 prisons in just 12 weeks (see his book: Child #38316, 10 Prisons in 12 Weeks – available online, should you be interested.)

Brian has been deliberately made homeless twice to the point that he was forced to sleep in his car for over a year.

Despite having a lucrative Teacher’s Pension, he has not been paid a penny of this for 13 years, since he officially retired.

Now, why would the State persecute Brian in this manner?

It is largely because:

1) Agents of the State do not want to admit the child abuse, the child pornography, the illegal radiation tests and more abuses perpetrated on the children in the aforementioned home;

2) Brian’s younger brother, Alan, claimed he was abused by Princess Margaret in her Sussex home and Buckingham Palace – for years nobody believed him until the ‘Prince Andrew scandal’;

3) Brian uncovered child trafficking in Lambeth linked to the Jeffrey Epstein scandal and was fraudulently dismissed because of his reporting it;

4) Brian uncovered an illegal police sting operation as stated by your colleague Marcia Weise being perpetrated by Scotland Yard;

5) Brian re-investigated the famous case of Norfolk farmer Tony Martin and found documents hidden up by the police for 25 years which proved the farmer’s innocence and that the authorities knew the farmer to be innocent prior to taking him to trial. (See Brian’s book tony martin: target of police conspiracy available on the website.)

What you are being asked to do

There are a number of ways we believe that you can help us with as we are in regular contact with King Charles by way of Open Letters (posted on www.brianpead.com):

1) We would appreciate an email/letter from you confirming that

            – you were Brian Pead’s solicitor in the case in 2008-2009;

– that Brian had informed you and Mr Bell about the unlawful seizure of Geoffrey Bacon’s computer;

– that the computer had not been placed in an evidence bag when being unlawfully seized;

– that, upon its return to the owner, the hard drive had been burnt out, together with the evidence of Brian’s exposing a fake teen on the Faceparty website;

– that Brian informed you both that he had been dismissed at Lambeth after he had reported child abuse and trafficking;

– that Brian had informed you both about the comments made by police station advisor Marcia Weise at Charing Cross police station on 4th June 2008;

– that Brian had informed you both of his love for his daughter and grandchildren;

– that Brian had, indeed, dismissed Mr Bell during the Southwark trial and that you were called to the Court to inform the judge;

– that Section 10 of the Sexual Offences Act refers to offences against real people not undercover police or ‘figments of their imagination’;

– that Brian’s detailed 114-page Defence Statements were never entered into Court;

– that the same Defence Statements were reduced to less than one side of A4 by Mr Bell in response to two separate Indictments (unlawfully Joined);

– that Brian had emailed you during the trial to complain about Mr Bell’s unlawful behaviour and his refusal to call Geoffrey Bacon as a witness as to fact.